advanced
Journal Information
Journal Information

   Description
   Editorial Board
   Guide for Authors
   Ordering

Contents Services
Contents Services

   Regular Issues
   Special Issues
   Authors Index

Links
Links

   FEI STU Bratislava    deGruyter-Sciendo

   Feedback

[5, 2018] 

Journal of Electrical Engineering, Vol 69, 5 (2018) 395-399 DOI: 10.2478/jee-2018-0058

Harmonic and pulsed eddy current testing methods as tools for surface
and subsurface defect evaluation

Lukáš Behúň – Karel Slobodník

   In most publications eddy current testing (ECT) methods are said to be suitable for surface defects up to several millimeters. This paper aims to evaluate the detection capabilities of eddy current testing based on two examples of modern approach. One of them is a harmonic eddy current method with use of wavelet transformation and neural network. The second method is pulsed eddy current testing (PECT) with use of evaluation script based on cross-correlation of measured data with the set of known reference signals. Two samples with five artificial defects each were investigated from the near and far side. Geometric parameters of every defect were then estimated. Results show that both methods are limited by the skin effect. However, the PECT with use of cross-correlation exhibits detection capabilities of subsurface defects in significant depth. On the other hand, harmonic eddy current testing shows lower errors in dimensions estimation for set of surface defects.

Keywords: ECT, PECT, eddy current, cross-correlation, neural network, wavelet transform


[full-paper]


© 1997-2023  FEI STU Bratislava